Annotated Bibliography
Domingo, D.,
& Heinonen, A. (2008). Weblogs and Journalism: A Typology to Explore the
Blurring Boundaries. Nordicom Review 29
10-12. Retrieved from http://jclass.umd.edu/classes/jour698m/domingoblogs.pdf
Domingo & Heinonen PhD investigate three variations of
Weblogging by journalists within Media institutions in their typology of
journalistic weblogs. Domingo & Heinonen illustrate media weblogs as a
rather freeform expression of news, free from the editorial pressures of more
public news media. While the authors might articulate this as a positive step
towards transparency in the media, they also admit to a certain divergence from
traditional journalistic practice that causes blogs to become sloppy and
irrelevant. This might also be interpreted in the subject of tabloid journalism
and reflect a redirection of news values from pressing issues to entertainment
news. The authors break down media weblogs into three categories, outlining
their important in online media. The first of these is the ‘special event
weblog’ that covers breaking news and current affair, in the author’s own
words; “the story is born and dies with the event’s newsworthiness”. These
stories are very apparent through social media as well as large media
institutions and are useful, as Domingo and Heinonen explain, in breaking news
to the public as quickly as it happens. Opinion Weblogs make use of the unregulated
nature of Weblogging by presenting issues through the authors own perspective
and allowing personal opinion within the piece. These types of blogs are useful
as they give the audience a chance to weigh in on a subject, creating an online
forum for the issue through a comments section within the piece. News
commentary weblogs are an elaboration on particular stories by correspondents
or the author that aren’t published with the initial story. A useful extension
of these weblogs is the author’s ability to interface with their audience,
sharing sources and facts and receiving advice on how the story should be
constructed.
Israeli
Prime minister dissolves parliament for January election.
Pollard, R. (2012, October 11). Netanyahu calls early election
to halt ‘turmoil’. The Sydney Morning Herald Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/world/netanyahu-calls-early-poll-to-halt-turmoil-20121010-27dfb.html
Middle East correspondent Ruth
Pollard reports on proceedings in Jerusalem through a fairly specific lens;
though the article works its way through Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s
political standing within Israeli parliament and makes no allusions to the
one-sidedness of the coming election, attention inevitably turns to the looming
threat of Iran’s nuclear weapons programme. Recent tension between Netanyahu
and U.S. President Barack Obama has led to perceived support of Netanyahu’s
coalition party for Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who supports more
direct action in Iran than the incumbent Obama. This opinion is resonated through-out
other news sources, Al Jazeera’s Cal Perry reported that Mitt Romney is more
willing to support Israeli military strikes. The Israeli PM has already been
remanded by the U.S. for threatening words towards Iran at the UN general
assembly, however Israel continues to threaten that the international community
has “until the middle of next year” to halt Iran nuclear production permanently.
Pollard assumes that the intensions of the Netanyahu administration are to win
an unopposed election, strengthening the mandate for military action against
anti-Israeli Iran; however through the media this has become relatively
transparent. This assertion is supported by similar online news articles who
give no allusion to the intention of warfare by Israel; however this article
examines only the surface of the political and economic reasons behind the
Likud party’s dissolution of parliament for the early election.
Heller, A. (2012 October 15). Israeli Parliament dissolves for
early election. Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-10-15/israeli-parliament-to-schedule-new-election
Aron Heller’s Bloomberg article
is a perfect example of Domingo and Heinonen’s special event weblog. Published
on Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Heller’s article gives a deeper insight into
political and economic reasons for the reschedule of Israel’s primary election.
Heller opens by reinforcing the fact that Netanyahu’s party runs against an
opposition that is fractured and leaderless. This is reflected in accounts of
disorganization amongst parliamentary debate and the majority coalition that
Netanyahu heads. Heller turns the focus to the administrations social and
economic policies; massive protests in Tel Aviv against the growing division
between rich and poor and complaints of segregation in the west bank throw
doubts over Netanyahu’s strong campaign. Working from Jerusalem Heller is able
to give a more intimate look into the politics behind Israel’s early election;
unable to pass a budget under the fractured coalition government in power,
economically minded Netanyahu (being the Economic Strategy Minister of Israel)
believes that the economy cannot sustain until the elections previous scheduled
date in October 2013, information that is reflected in the Al Jazeera news
report. Heller’s article tips the weight toward Netanyahu’s political image
amongst his opposing parties writing that the Likud coalition’s opposition will
seek to capitalize on Netanyahu’s image as a cold capitalist in their bid for
votes, as well as his controversial policies that involve religious privilege
for ultra-Orthodox Jews.
Perry, C. (Producer). (2012 October 9). Israeli PM calls early
election [News report]. Gaza: Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera’s Cal Perry is somewhat of a veteran of Middle
Eastern correspondence and adds a new dimension in a news report on Israel’s
early election. In footage from an interview we find that the opinion of
Netanyahu’s rush to the poll is in a bid to engage Iran militarily confirmed by
an Israeli citizen who declares that “he has no-one above him…. He can pass a
budget, he can make a war, whatever he wants”. Again we see a negative
connotation of Netanyahu’s intent in pushing forward the election; we can also
perceive that this whole issue is very transparent, through society and the
media. Adding to the scope of the subject, Perry gives voice to the Palestinian
movement Hamas who claim that no Israeli government will give Palestinians their
full right and that Jewish settlements on the west bank are obstructing the
partition between the Islamist Hamas and the Jewish Israeli territory. These
comments come not only in the wake of the anti-Zionist threats from
fundamentalist Islam in Iran but also from accusations in the Knesset by
opposition leader Shaul Mofaz of turning Israel into a bi-national state by
bending to Hamas’ partition. Consistent with other representations of Netanyahu
and the character of his government; Perry’s report from Gaza highlights the
arguably undemocratic state of affairs within Israel, representing the Israeli
government determined on a military conflict with Iran. While Al Jazeera is
respected for its transparency, it holds a tendency to scrutinize acts of belligerence
(easily perceptible in this event) in a leftist perspective.